NAEEM MALIK نعیم ملک

2009

Filed under: Naeem Malik — naeemmalik @ 6:30 pm

Islamabad Tonight – 1st October 2009

Islamabad Tonight – 1st October 2009

Ayatullah Durrani, Hamayyu Akhtar, Khurram Datagir Khan PML-N and Senator Prof. Ibrahim Khan JI in fresh episode of Islamabad Tonight & discusses current issue with Nadeem Malik.

Islamabadtonight1oct2009.jpg Islamabadtonight1oct2009.jpg Islamabadtonight1oct2009.jpg

اسی فیصد پاکستانی دہشت گردی کے خلاف امریکی امداد کے حق میں نہیں- آئی آر آئی

چھیترفیصد ڈرون حملوں کے خلاف ہیں

نوازشریف کی مقبولیت میں ۸ فیصد کمی

آصف زرداری کو صرف ۲۵ فیصد لگ پسند کرتے ہیں- آئی آر آئی

آئین کسی آرمی چیف کو مارشل لا لگانے کا اختیار نہیں دیتا

آئین ایک لمحے کیلئے بھی معطل نہیں کیا جا سکتا

سپریم کورٹ کے ماضی میں کیے جانے والے فیصلے آرمی چیف کیلئے آئین توڑنے کا لائسنس نہیں

جنرل پرویز مشرف نے آرٹیکل چھھ کے تحت انتہائی بغاوت کا ارتکاب کیا

جنرل پرویز مشرف کے جاری کردہ تمام آرڈیننس غیر موثر ہو چکے ہیں

جمہوری تسلسل برقرار رکھنے کے اسول کے تحت تمام آرڈیننس دوبارہ پارلیمنٹ سے منظور کروانے کی سہولت دی گئی ہے

STATUS OF ORDINANCES ISSUED BY GENERAL PERVEZ MUSHARRAF

Under PCO Ordinance issued by the President which was in force immediately before the commencement of Proclamation of Emergency of the 3rd day of November, 2007 shall not be subject to limitations

All the Ordinances, which were in force on 3rd November, 2007 as well as the Ordinances which were promulgated on or after 3rd November, 2007 up to 15th December, 2007 were continued in force as permanent laws and were not laid before the respective legislatures during the period prescribed by the Constitution

Proclamation of Emergency and PCO No. 1 of 2007 having been declared unconstitutional and void ab initio and the validity purportedly conferred on all such Ordinances by means of Article 270AAA and by the judgment in Tikka Iqbal Muhammad Khan’s case also having been shorn, such Ordinances would cease to be permanent laws with the result that the life of such Ordinances would be limited to the period specified in Articles 89 and 128 of the Constitution, viz., four months and three months respectively from the date of their promulgation

Under Article 89 of the Constitution, an Ordinance issued by the President, if not so laid before the National Assembly, or both Houses of Parliament, stands repealed on expiration of four months from its promulgation

Similarly, under Article 128 of the Constitution, an Ordinance issued by the Governor, if not so laid before the concerned Provincial Assembly, stands repealed on expiration of three months from its promulgation

Such Ordinances were continued in force throughout under a wrong notion that they had become permanent laws

The fact remains that on the touchstone of the provisions of Articles

89 and 128 read with Article 264 of the Constitution and section 6 of the

General Clauses Act, 1897, only such rights, privileges, obligations, or liabilities would lawfully be protected as were acquired, accrued or incurred under the said Ordinances during the period of four months or three months, as the case may be, from their promulgation, whether before or after 3rd November, 2007, and not thereafter, until such Ordinances were enacted as Acts by the Parliament or the concerned Provincial Assembly with retrospective effect

Validation of such Ordinances would be required to be decided by the Parliament or the concerned Provincial Assemblies

Period of four months and three months would be deemed to commence from the date of short order passed on 31st July, 2009 and steps may be taken to lay such Ordinances before the Parliament or the respective Provincial Assemblies

Extension of time has been allowed in order to acknowledge the doctrine of trichotomy of powers as enshrined in the Constitution, to preserve continuity, to prevent disorder, to protect private rights, to strengthen the democratic institutions and to enable them to perform their constitutional functions, which they were unconstitutionally and illegally denied under PCO No. 1 of 2007

Validation whether with retrospective effect or otherwise, shall always be subject to judicial review on the well recognized principles of ultra vires, non-conformity with the Constitution or violation of the Fundamental Rights, or on any other available ground

CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE SUSPENDED/HELD IN ABEYANCE FOR A MOMENT

Martial law in any form and by whatever name called, for any purpose whatsoever cannot be imposed in Pakistan

Proclamation of emergency can be issued, the effect of which is to hold in abeyance the Constitution, or its subsequent mutilation by incorporating amendments in it by an authority not mentioned in the Constitution

Each member of the Armed Forces is bound to bear true faith and allegiance to Pakistan and uphold the Constitution

General Pervez Musharraf failed to abide by his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution

Constitution was framed to continue to be in force at all times

Article 6, an in-built mechanism was provided to safeguard the Constitution from its abrogation or subversion by anyone

The Constitution has not contemplated any situation where it can be held in abeyance at the will or whims of the Chief of Army Staff and to be revived after he has achieved his objectives

Validity accorded in the past did not give a licence to any holder of the office of Chief of Army Staff of repeating such acts at his will

Holding in abeyance of the Constitution or any other act having the effect of discontinuing the operation and the enforceability of the Constitution for a single moment in a manner not authorized under the Constitution is nothing but an overthrowing of the Constitution, so to say, the subversion of the Constitution and thus constitutes the offence of high treason.

PASSING OF RESTRAINT ORDER BY SEVEN MEMBER BENCH

Passing of the restraint order was the most striking distinction between the actions of 3rd November, 2007 on the one hand, and the actions of previous military takeovers, e.g. 12th October, 1999, 5th July, 1977, 25th March, 1969, 7th October, 1958, etc

PAKISTANIS REJECT US ASSISTANCE- IRI SURVEY

80 percent oppose US assistance for Pakistan in the war against terror-IRI

76 percent oppose partnering with US on drone attacks

Approval ratings of Zardari at 25 percent-IRI

Approval ratings of Nawaz Sharif dropped by 8 percentage points to 67 percent-IRI

US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVES KERRY-LUGAR BILL

80 فیصد پاکستانی دہشت گردی کے خلاف امریکی امداد قبول کرنے کے حق میں نہیں- آئی آر آئی

چھیترفیصد ڈرون حملوں کے خلاف ہیں

نوازشریف کی مقبولیت میں ۸ فیصد کمی

آصف زرداری کو صرف ۲۵ فیصد لگ پسند کرتے ہیں- آئی آر آئی

. پاکستان مسلم لیگ نون پارلیمنٹ میں این آر او کے خلاف ووٹ دے گی-خرم دستگیر

. مشرف دور کے اقدامات کا سب سے زیادہ فایدہ ایم کیو ایم کو ھوا-پروفیسر ابراہیم

.

. بد ترین جمہوریت بھی ڈکٹیٹر شپ سے بہتر ھوتی ہے- خرم دستگیر

. ساری پارلیمنٹ متفق ھو تو آرٹیکل 6 پر عمل ھو سکتا ہے-آیت اللہ درانی

. کیری لوگر بل کی شرایط کسی صورت قبول نہ کی جایں-ہمایوں اختر

. کیری لوگر بل کا پاس ھونا موجودہ حکومت کے لیے بہت بڑا سفارتی دھچکہ ہے- خرم دستگیر

. جماعت اسلامی کل پورے ملک میں کیری لوگر بل کے خلاف احتجاج کرے گی-پروفیسر ابراہیم

. پاکستان امداد اور قرضے لینَ کی بجائے اپنے پاوں پر کھڑا ھونا سیکھے پروفیسر ابراہیم

. پاکستان پیپلز پارٹی سے پہلے بھی حکومتیں امریکہ سے امداد لیتی رہی ہیں-آیت اللہ درانی

. قومی اسمبلی کے آئیندہ اجلاس میں وزیر اعظم کو کیری لوگر بل کے تحت امداد

. لینے سے انکار کر دینا چاہیے- خرم دستگیر

. پاکستان امریکہ کی وار آن ٹیرر سے جتنی جلدی نکل جاے بہتر ھو گا –پروفیسر ابراہیم

. آصف علی زرداری اور نواز شریف غیر ملکی بنکوں سے اپنا سرمایا پاکستان لے آیں-پروفیسر ابراہیم

Advertisements

%d bloggers like this: